This table shows the extent to which various options for PPL length provide positive benefits, on a number of criteria. For detailed discussion and justification, simply find the relevant criteria under “I’m Interested In Effects On…”
The table suggests that 52 weeks or 26 weeks would be preferable to 14 weeks. However, we should remember that this report also strongly suggests that a maximum payment increase is needed. PPL is ineffective if payments are so low that families cannot afford it. A payment cap that is equal with minimum wage is recommended. If minimum wage is judged to be the minimum required to keep the average adult in adequate living conditions, it is surely a minimum requirement for parents with new children. Minimum wage is here suggested as the maximum, on the assumption that many new parents have an earning partner or other financial support. If we consider this payment increase, the expenditure cost on 12 months of leave would get very high. For this reason, 26 weeks is recommended, in combination with a maximum payment increase. This could be evaluated after three or four years, with consideration of an increase to 12 months.
|
|
14 weeks |
26 weeks |
52 weeks |
Best Alternative |
|
Maternal Health |
Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
26 weeks |
|
Family Economic Wellbeing |
High |
High |
Moderate |
52 weeks |
|
Gender Equity |
Low |
High |
Moderate |
26 weeks |
|
Breastfeeding |
Low |
High |
High |
52 weeks |
|
Bonding & Care |
Low |
Moderate |
High |
52 weeks |
|
Staff Retention |
Low |
High |
Moderate |
26 weeks |
|
Business Productivity |
Low |
Moderate-High |
Moderate-High |
26 weeks or 52 weeks |
|
OECD Comparability |
Low |
Moderate |
High |
52 weeks |
|
Macro-economic Effects |
Moderate |
High |
Moderate |
26 weeks |