Findings
International and local research and case studies identified the following:
E
ffective youth justice initiatives:
- Have clear objectives and aims
- Touch the four corners of a young person’s life: family, school/work, peer group, community
- Focus on prevention and early intervention, and addresses many risk factors
- Ensure there are strong partnerships and communication between professionals, parents, non-professionals, and agencies
- Include education and training and teaches health and life skills
- Are culturally specific
- Ensure there is minimal intervention for minor offences and first time offenders – avoidance of the formal court system as much is possible preferrable
- Avoid stigmatisation and labelling of the young offender
- Have outcomes where the offender accepts responsibility for wrongdoing and genuinely feels remorse
- Have well-trained staff who can have a positive influence on young people
- Evaluate outcomes continually
- Put in place reintegration measures once programme is completed
Ineffective youth justice initiatives:
- Comprise of punitive and deterrent responses involving shock tactics, punishments, and fear, for instance, arrest only, boot camps, scared straight programmes, military style responses, intensive police monitoring in the community and corrective training
- Do not address the key risk factors and needs of young offenders
- Are approaches with few contact hours for high-needs offenders or intensive programmes for low-needs offenders
- Consist of disrespectful, unfair and shaming initiatives
- Do not pay attention to the background needs of youth offenders and their circumstances
- Are insensitive to important variables such as the gender and cultural background
- Rely too much on the formal court system
- Do not enhance communication between various agencies and actors involved